Dependence, Covariance & Correlation
Dependence means variables carry information about one another; covariance and correlation summarize only part of that relationship and can hide nonlinear or common-event risk.
Two observations are dependent when learning one changes what should be believed about the other. Correlation is a useful linear summary, but “uncorrelated” is not the same as “independent” except under special models.
Covariance and correlation #
For variables and ,
Covariance has product units; correlation is dimensionless. The variance of a sum exposes why dependence matters:
Positive covariance makes combined outcomes swing together; negative covariance can offset them.
Life example #
Travel time by car and bus can both rise on a snow day. Averaging two transport estimates does not create two independent pieces of evidence when weather drives both.
Trading example #
Suppose two positions each have variance 0.2275. If independent, their sum has variance 0.455. If covariance is 0.15, variance becomes . The expected profit can add normally while the risk grows much faster than an independence assumption suggests.
Application to no-hedge #
No-hedge positions commonly share the same reference feed and execution logic. A stale or biased reference can move every estimated in the same direction. Aggregate exposure by common settlement event, signal, venue, and time window before sizing; never apply a single-trade limit separately to correlated copies.
Self-check: if correlation is zero, are X and Y independent?
Not generally. Zero correlation rules out a linear covariance relationship, but nonlinear dependence may remain.